BLOG DETAILS
Protein Digestibility Corrected Amino Acid Score (PDCAAS)- A method to evaluate quality of protein

Protein Digestibility Corrected Amino Acid Score (PDCAAS)- A method to evaluate quality of protein

Introduction:

The protein digestibility-corrected amino acid score (PDCAAS) has been used to evaluate protein quality in human foods.  Previously Amino Acid Scoring (AAS) provides a way to predict how efficiently protein will meet a person’s amino acid needs. But this method has some drawbacks, in this method AAS is determined after acid hydrolysis of proteins which results in total amino acid content but some of the amino acids in the total pool are not bioavailable. Some of the protein may not be digested completely and an error in AAS has been observed. The degree of error varies depending on food e.g highly processed food has impaired digestibility & proteins with plant origin have lower digestibility.

The protein digestibility– corrected amino acid score (PDCAAS) has been adopted by FAO/WHO as the preferred method for the measurement of the protein value in human nutrition. The method is based on comparison of the concentration of the first limiting essential amino acid in the test protein with the concentration of that amino acid in a reference (scoring) pattern. After calculating the score a digestibility factor was multiplied. In vitro digestibility of protein has been carried out by two main enzyme that are responsible to digest the proteins these are pepsin and pancreatin.

For this purpose, an experiment was conducted to compare values for digestible amino acid scores for six health/ nutraceutical supplement proteins with values calculated as recommended for protein digestibility-corrected amino acid scores (PDCAAS).

Materials & Methods

Reagents & standards:

Amino acids standards were procured from Merck India. SRL , Acetonitrile, Methanol (all Chromatography grade )from Rankem. FMOC, OPA, Borate  buffer were also procured from Agilent Tech. HCL & TCA from Merck, Enzyme Pancreatin and Pepsin was purchased from Loba chemical. Hydrogen peroxide and formic acid from Merck were taken for the study.

Equipments & other Materials:

Shimadzu LC-2030 series HPLC consisting of a Quaternary pump, UV detector with an automated Sample Injector and column oven compartment. Lab solution software was used for data interpretation and the chromatographic separation was performed on a reversed-phase column (Agilent Technologies Advance Bio Peptide Map 4.6 × 150 mm, 3.5 µm). Assorted glassware, Micropipette, Multivap, digitally temperature-controlled water bath.

Total Nitrogen was estimated by Total Nitrogen analyzer by Pelican.

Methods for amino acid profiling:

Performic acid oxidation

Performic acid is prepared freshly by adding 1 ml of 30 % H2O2 to 9 mL of 88 % formic acid and 50 mg phenol. Mix was cooled to 0 ⁰C. Two mL of performic acid was added to the protein powder equivalent to 5 mg protein. The reaction mixture kept for 4 h. Excess reagents removed by diluting with water and then removed under vacuum. This is repeated two times and finally dried to completeness. Standard amino acid cystine (1 mg) and methionine (1 mg) were treated similarly.

Hydrolysis

The sample is then transferred to a hydrolysis tube and Added 1 mL HCl (6 M) a small amount of phenol (0.5%) to the performic acid oxidized protein powder sealed under nitrogen. The hydrolysis is carried out for 24 h @110 oC. After Adjusting pH to 7 this mix was subjected to derivatization

Derivatization

Derivatization was performed by reacting the free amino acids with OPA and FMOC  in presence of  borate buffer to form corresponding amino acid derivatives which are detectable at UV region

This process takes approximately 30 minutes per sample.

LC conditions

System: Shimadzu LC-2030

Column: Agilent ZORBAX Eclipse AAA, 4.6×150mm, 3.5µm

Column temperature: 40ºC

Flow rate: 2.0mL/min

Mobile phase A: 40mM phosphate buffer pH-7.8

Mobile phase B: Methanol : Acetonitrile : Water = 45:45:10

Detection (Dual wavelength):Channel A: 338 nm Channel B: 262 nm

In-vitro Protein Digestibility: Procedure

1 gm representative test Sample were taken and to added  25 mg of Pepsin in 0.1N HCl. The sample with enzyme were incubated at 37 °C for 3 hrs. After that it was cooled and neutralized with 0.5N NaOH. After this 20mg of Pancreatin in 7.5ml of phosphate buffer was again added to this mix and again incubated 37°C for 24h. All the digestible protein should be digested in this process the remaining undigested protein was precipitated out with 10 ml of 10% TCA. After that the mixture was Centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 20 min. Nitrogen in supernatant estimated by Kjeldahl method which was representing the Soluble Nitrogen/ digested nitrogen.

Results & Discussion:

Protein Digestibility Corrected Amino Acid Scoring (PDCAAS) was calculated on the basis of the WHO/FAO essential amino acid scoring pattern for infant, children and adult using the protein digestibility values obtained via in vitro methods for correction. Table 1. Shows the AAS.

Table 1. The WHO/FAO recommended amino acid scoring patterns

Cys +

 

Met

Phe + Tyr Thr Trp Val
  Scoring pattern mg/g protein requirement
Infant (Birth to 6 months) 21 55 96 69 33 94 44 17 55
Child (6 months to 3 yrs) 20 32 66 57 27 52 31 8.5 43
Older child, adolescent, adult 16 30 61 48 23 41 25 6.6 40

Digestibility of Different Health Supplement Milk/Nutraceutical protein Powder was performed. The products are selected in such a way that it can cover both children and adult. The protein digestibility of different products of different brands was demonstrated in table 2. For brand B & brand E found most

Table 2: Digestibility of Different Health Supplement Milk/ Protein Powder

Product Category                Digestibility (%)
Brand A (For Adult/ adolescent) 86.9
Brand B (For Adult/ adolescent) 82.2
Brand C (For Adult/ adolescent) 94.5
Brand D (Child- 6 months to 3 yrs ) 94.1
Brand E (For Adult/ adolescent) 73.3
Brand F (Child- 6 months to 3 yrs ) 99.8
Brand G (For Adult/ adolescent) 95.2

PDCAAS Results Calculation:

The calculation of  PDCAAS = (limiting amino acid content in sample protein/same amino acid content of the reference pattern) × protein digestibility. According to this calculation the PDCAAS value of different products are represented as-

The limiting amino acids for the category of 6 month to 3 years old children are estimated and PDCAAS values are calculated in using the above equation. Elaborated result is demonstrated in following table.

Table 3: PDCAAS of Different Health Supplement Milk/ Protein Powder for the category of 6 month to 3 years old children

Name of LAA WHO Ref Standard mg/g Brand D (Child- 6 months to 3 yrs ) mg/g AAS of Brand D (Child- 6 months to 3 yrs ) PDCAAS Brand F (Child- 6 months to 3 yrs ) Brand F (Child- 6 months to 3 yrs ) mg/g AAS Brand F (Child- 6 months to 3 yrs ) PDCAAS Brand F (Child- 6 months to 3 yrs )  
 
 
Isoleucine 32 48 1.5 1.4 36 1.1 1.1  
Leucine 66 81 1.2 1.2 69 1.0 1.0  
Lysine 57 62 1.1 1.0 61 1.1 1.1  
Histidine 20 74 3.7 3.5 30 1.5 1.5  
Threonine 31 36 1.2 1.1 32 1.0 1.0  
Cystine+Meth 27 146 5.4 5.1 39 +11 1.9 1.9  
Phenylalanine+TYR 52 54 1.0 1.0 35 +19 1.0 1.0  
Tryptophan 8.5 16 1.9 1.8 12 1.4 1.4  
Valine 43 52 1.2 1.1 48 1.1 1.1  

The limiting amino acids for the category of adolescent and adult are also estimated and PDCAAS values are calculated in similar way. Elaborated result is demonstrated in following table

Table 4: PDCAAS of Different Health Supplement Milk/ Protein Powder for the category  of adolescent and adult

 

 

 

 

WHO Ref Standard

 

mg/g

Brand B (For Adult/ adolescent) mg/g AAS of Brand B (For Adult/ adolescent) PDCAAS Brand B Brand G  (For Adult/ adolescent) mg/g AAS Brand G  (For Adult/ adolescent) PDCAAS Brand G Brand E  (For Adult/ adolescent) mg/g AAS  Brand E  (For Adult/ adolescent)  PDCAAS  Brand E Brand A (For Adult/ adolescent) mg/g AAS of Brand A (For Adult/ adolescent) PDCAAS Brand A  
 
Isoleucine 30 34 1.1 0.9 85 2.83 2.7 72 2.4 1.8 48 1.6 1.4  
Leucine 61 87 1.4 1.1 90 1.48 1.4 83 1.4 1.0 81 1.3 1.1  
Lysine 48 49 1.0 0.8 52 1.08 1.0 56 1.2 0.9 62 1.3 1.1  
Histidine 16 17 1.1 0.9 19 1.19 1.1 23 1.4 1.0 74 4.6 4.0  
Threonine 25 32 1.3 1.1 30 1.20 1.1 28 1.1 0.8 36 1.4 1.2  
Cystine+Meth 23 15 +11 1.1 0.9 65 2.83 2.7 94 4.1 3.0 146 6.3 5.5  
Phenylalanine+TYR 41 43 +6 1.2 1.0 8 + 34 1.02 1.0 29 +15 1.1 0.8 54 1.3 1.1  
Tryptophan 6.6 9 1.4 1.1 12 1.82 1.7 26 3.9 2.8 16 2.4 2.1  
Valine 40 48 1.2 1.0 45 1.13 1.1 44 1.1 0.8 52 1.3 1.1  

Conclusion:

In conclusion, the current data support a PDCAAS value for milk/nutraceutical/protein powder for the variety products are tested. Concurrent

assessment of in vitro digestibility provides the data of quality of proteins. PDCAAS of All Infant Formula under study having good digestivity and the other Milk powder /Health Supplementary e.g. Brand A. Brand C, Brand G are found a good source of protein as its PDCAAS value is greater than 1 but In Case of Brand B & Brand E , we found the PDCAAS value less than 1.

Therefore, we can conclude from this study that Brand B & Brand E are the incomplete protein and not suitable as a sole protein source in the diet, we need another protein supplement to fulfil the requirement.

Testimonial

Write to Us

LATEST blog

Phase transformation of silica in Coal and Biomass burning processes and its implications on human health

Phase transformation of silica in Coal and Biomass burning processes and its implications on human health

Posted on December 30 2023 By Mitra S.K ADMIN

Read More
MODIFIED GRAVIMETRIC ESTIMATION
OF COBALT IN BLACK MASS

MODIFIED GRAVIMETRIC ESTIMATION OF COBALT IN BLACK MASS

Posted on December 30 2023 By Mitra S.K ADMIN

MICROPLASTIC IN MILK. AN EMERGING THREAT

MICROPLASTIC IN MILK. AN EMERGING THREAT

Posted on December 27 2023 By Mitra S.K ADMIN

DNA based approach for the detection of GMO

DNA based approach for the detection of GMO

Posted on December 27 2023 By Mitra S.K ADMIN

Assessing leaching potential of Electronic Waste

Assessing leaching potential of Electronic Waste

Posted on December 26 2023 By Mitra S.K ADMIN

Analysis of Red Mud

Analysis of Red Mud

Posted on December 09 2022 By Mitra S.K ADMIN

QUANTIFICATION OF POTASSIUM IN NPK FERTILIZER BY GRAVIMETRY

QUANTIFICATION OF POTASSIUM IN NPK FERTILIZER BY GRAVIMETRY

Posted on December 02 2022 By Mitra S.K ADMIN

Recycling of lead acid batteries

Recycling of lead acid batteries

Posted on December 02 2022 By Mitra S.K ADMIN

EXTRACTION AND ISOLATION OF PIPERINE FROM BLACK PEPPER

EXTRACTION AND ISOLATION OF PIPERINE FROM BLACK PEPPER

Posted on December 01 2022 By Mitra S.K ADMIN

Nitrogen Profile in Fertilizer by IR Absorption Spectroscopy

Nitrogen Profile in Fertilizer by IR Absorption Spectroscopy

Posted on November 30 2022 By Mitra S.K ADMIN

Determination of Organic carbon and Inorganic carbon of Biomass

Determination of Organic carbon and Inorganic carbon of Biomass

Posted on November 30 2022 By Mitra S.K ADMIN

Analysis of Anti-Nutritional Factors of Wine

Analysis of Anti-Nutritional Factors of Wine

Posted on November 30 2022 By Mitra S.K ADMIN

Our clients